- Published scope
- Focused conversion review of one public page or funnel, delivered as a 6–10 page PDF. SEO, analytics and implementation are excluded.
- Market note
- Online service; the published page does not state a geographic restriction.
Alytixx Website Snapshot
Automated vs manual website audit
Alytixx and a manual website audit solve different parts of the decision: the US$199 Snapshot gives a fast, repeatable public-evidence baseline, while a specialist can add interviews, private analytics, strategic judgment and implementation support.
Direct pricing evidence
Published audit service reference points
These are direct published prices, not a market average. Scope, depth and delivery differ, so compare the deliverables—not only the number.
- Published scope
- The Basic tier reviews the top five pages and core technical, mobile and schema signals. Full adds 46 checks, backlinks, competitors, internal linking, content, local SEO and conversion UX.
- Market note
- Published in USD for an online service; tax and regional terms may differ.
- Published scope
- Fixed-scope SEO audit and roadmap with technical review, page-level issues, prioritization and an implementation sequence. Ongoing implementation is separate.
- Market note
- Published in USD; implementation is optional and priced separately.
Website audit cost calculator
Model your own audit cost
Use your actual internal or supplier assumptions. Alytixx does not publish an unsupported market-price range.
Enter hours and hourly cost to compare.
When automation fits
Choose the automated Snapshot when you need a consistent inventory, selected-page checks, competitor evidence and a prioritized starting point without first commissioning a consulting project.
When manual work fits
Choose a manual specialist when the question depends on private data, stakeholder interviews, regulated requirements, original research, custom experimentation or hands-on implementation.
A practical hybrid
A strong hybrid sequence is Snapshot first, then direct specialist time toward the highest-impact findings and context the public audit cannot observe.
Limits of the comparison
The comparison uses dated direct examples, not a manufactured market average. Provider scopes differ, and neither delivery model guarantees rankings, traffic or conversion results.